tgm mentioned on golf digest

tgm mentioned on golf digest.

http://www.golfdigest.com/newsandtou...707fields.html

You are forgetting:

Zavin Majikan O'Grady Research and Development.

He's advertising that his long rumored book may come out this year.

Dang! And y'all think the little yellow book is a tough read. Wait till this one comes out...

Study up on your geometry so you can read objectively between the samenesses and the differences...by degree.

It will be an interesting read and hopefully Mac does a good job of standing on Homers shoulders. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.

Bagger

i will say i have no idea as to how the book will be written. but i will say mac is a very good comunicater and presents all his material in a very understandable way although you do leave him with an increased vocabulary

Big smiles

welocme dana you will enjoy this forum nice discusssions and very friendly to all different views

Ok ok....

A bunch of errors.

1. Back injuries did NOT drive Mac off the tour. How about qualifying once in 18 years???

2. It was never Mankind's Objective Research and Development to my knowledge. More like Mac O'Grady's (versus Mankind's Research).

3. UM,Mr Kelley was, what?, 70% on. Publish something...anything!, before you chirp.

4. 80 Snead, 20 Hogan, goodbye Trevino and all you hitters, you dont count.

And yes Mac, pm me and you can have my number....

(sorry all, but I had to, I couldnt resist.)

Please forgive me.

Patrick

p.s. I'm waiting mr Mankind.

you seemed to know alot about mac have you spent much time with him philly cheese

Patrick...

as a friend...

DON"T....


Annikan

Annikan is correct. I hasitly replied, and tried to edit but am unable to. I was way way way off base.

My apologies to all. Sometimes we (I) say things we shouldn't and unfortunately, this is one of my stick foot in mouth times (one of many!).

Please disregard my previous post.

Patrick

Well....

I mean...

Looking at those points....

They may have come out the wrong way...

You could prolly translate them into good meaningful relevant points tho no?

Originally Posted by birdie_man Well....

I mean...

Looking at those points....

They may have come out the wrong way...

You could prolly translate them into good meaningful relevant points tho no?

Birdie,
Perhaps, however, in this context, there was no reason (regardless of how valid or invalid my points are) to attack or challenge the way I did.

Therefore, I regret and apologize!



Ok, off to confession!



Patrick