And should you ever think about FORWARD?
Originally Posted by Matt Don't even think about it.Short Post but one that is as strong as TRAIN SMOKE!!!
The fact that at some point your lever assembly passes your left shoulder is enough to make it happen. It has no choice but to move forward.
Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket What Component is Most Responsible for FORWARD [and] should you ever think about FORWARD?Bucket, you are definitely into some serious smoke. I'm down for a dime.
Originally Posted by rwh Bucket, you are definitely into some serious smoke. I'm down for a dime.You nailed it, IMO.
Do we not have a clubhead that travels in an arc? Things moving in an arc only go clockwise or anti-clockwise. There is no forward or backward. And there is no inward or outward, at least not from the standpoint of the orbiting object. It's just going around and around. (I know you took those girls on the Tilt-A-Whirl at the carnival).
The swing arc of the clubhead is essentially the same whether you are performing it on the horizontal (torso vertical) or on an inclined plane (front of torso bent down toward the ground).
Arguably, thinking (conceptually) of anything other than swinging the clubhead in an arc is disruptive.
Originally Posted by rwh Bucket, you are definitely into some serious smoke. I'm down for a dime.Super post!
Do we not have a clubhead that travels in an arc? Things moving in an arc only go clockwise or anti-clockwise. There is no forward or backward. And there is no inward or outward, at least not from the standpoint of the orbiting object. It's just going around and around. (I know you took those girls on the Tilt-A-Whirl at the carnival).
The swing arc of the clubhead is essentially the same whether you are performing it on the horizontal (torso vertical) or on an inclined plane (front of torso bent down toward the ground).
Arguably, thinking (conceptually) of anything other than swinging the clubhead in an arc is disruptive.
Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket And should you ever think about FORWARD?Please, Please pay attention to who started this post! You're not working with a sound individual here!
Bagger, why aren't you responding to my repeated PM's to ban this Bucket! He's making me lose it
- help!Originally Posted by Mike O Please, Please pay attention to who started this post! You're not working with a sound individual here!That's right . . . call your little buddy Bagger the man who goes to the course in a skirt and cowboy boots. The infernal depth of your hatered is a boundless abyss.He knew exactly what he was doing- creating chaos- the Clown trying to bring the building down! He's a forum terrorist
Bagger, why aren't you responding to my repeated PM's to ban this Bucket! He's making me lose it
![]()
![]()
- help!
In 2-C-0 Homer writes: "The Law of Inertia: Newton's First Law. There is no change in the motion of a body unless a resultant force is acting upon it."
Is that exactly correct?- "resultant force is acting upon it" meaning at least two divergent forces- or could it just be one force? Doesn't seem to be very precise to me- writing "resultant"
So- I'm not thread jacking- just asked the above question to send Bucket into a tizzy!
I've got a comment on 2-N-1 (7th edition)- and Forward being a resultant force vector.
If you read his statement out of context it appears to be completely incorrect- outward and downward does not produce forward- but he's working within the context of the geometry of the circle but even that's not very good- the real key is 1-L and the Hinges- with their attachment to a centered post, it is the force of that post that adds the forward motion from the merely downward and outward forces. Anotherwords without the centered post of the Machine in 1-L- it does just go down and out and not forward- if it is only pushed downward and outward.
Originally Posted by 12 piece bucketBucket and MikeO,
So by all means emplore the Skirted Cowboy to rescue you . . .
Originally Posted by 12 piece bucketWhoa, the animal juices are a'flowin' here! And Halloween is still 30 days away!
And his disciple is a Bell Star wannabe.
As is The Sheriff! Originally Posted by Yoda Whoa, the animal juices are a'flowin' here! And Halloween is still 30 days away!The commercial said she shot a man once for snorin' too loud.
But Bucket, since you've taken in vain the name of my esteemed SHERIFF OF THE JOINT, Bagger Lance, I must protest...that would be Belle Star, not Bell Star.
And now the rest of the story...
*********************************************
FULL NAME: Myra Belle Shirley
BIRTH DATE: Feb. 5, 1848.
BIRTHPLACE: Carthage, Mo.
*******
Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket
. . . I bet she was a virgin too. What do y'all think?