Those of you that have worked with Mac, would you say that he feels that Homer's work is 30% incomplete or 30% inaccurate. I was looking for some information and couldn't find much.
Originally Posted by elygc1 Those of you that have worked with Mac, would you say that he feels that Homer's work is 30% incomplete or 30% inaccurate. I was looking for some information and couldn't find much.33.94832% inaccurate. However, more importantly he feels that Homer was a Nazi spy and and if you read the book backwards and upside down- you'd be a +2 in less than three months. It worked for me.
Originally Posted by drewitgolf First of all 47.3 % of all statisitics are made up.Well at least you can say "former" AI about him . . . there are plenty of CURRENT AI's who are heavily invested in trashing the book . . .
Mac or Phil O'Grady or Phil McGleno was a former A.I., who is making a name for himself at the expense of those who paved the way for him. While I don't discredit his contribution to golf instruction, I do question his lack of support for Mr. Kelley's work, especially when he want to purchase TGM after Mr. Kelley's passing.
Originally Posted by okie Awww do we have to talk about Mr. Tighty-Whitey? Bucket knows!Surfer knows it too! Just hope a marble don't fall out.
Originally Posted by 12 piece bucketOther than the continuing TGM cyberspace conundrum and its long-sought solution on this site, the first shot across the bow was V.J. Trolio's book, The Final Missing Piece. http://www.thefinalmissingpiece.com/
It's a strange parallel universe deal going on . . . the guys that are most ardently supporting Homer's legacy are considered "outkastz" and the one taking a squirt on the book at every turn are endorsed by the home office.
I used to say this all the time . . . "Wonder what it would be like if Homer was still around?" Well he ain't here and he ain't coming back. It's somebody else's house now . . . needs a fresh coat of paint . . . they ran out of yellow paint at the store . . . but I heard black was on sale.
[Bold emphasis by Yoda.]
Originally Posted by okie Holy crap, Machiavelli! Keep them nitro pills handy! I say Yoda puts out a 24 volume DVD series! There is no marketing benefit for advertising the truth...it promises complexity, and no short cuts but more know how. You can call it the Prunella Domanatrix...or whatever...reword all of HK carefully selected terms and repackage...but there will ALWAYS be 7 Editions for the discerning golfer. I may sound elitist but the TRUTH is a bitter pill...one must not mistake thinking for merely rearranging predjudices. Er...that is all I got to say about dat.
Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket Well at least you can say "former" AI about him . . . there are plenty of CURRENT AI's who are heavily invested in trashing the book . . .New insurance policy wouldn't cover the medication? Ya, I've been there before!
Seems to me if these cats were all that revolutionary they'd be saying . . .
"Look what I done found out." Instead of . . . "Look at what a dipstick Homer Kelley was and what a bunch of sychophant retards all of his supporters are." How can your platform be . . . I'm a GSED . . . but the book is all wrong.
If you don't like the book . . . fine . . . write your own freakin' book . . . publish it . . . revise it 7 times . . . papa needs a brand new bag.
It's a strange parallel universe deal going on . . . the guys that are most ardently supporting Homer's legacy are considered "outkastz" and the one taking a squirt on the book at every turn are endorsed by the home office.
I used to say this all the time . . . "Wonder what it would be like if Homer was still around?" Well he ain't here and he ain't coming back. It's somebody else's house now . . . needs a fresh coat of paint . . . they ran out of yellow paint at the store . . . but I heard black was on sale.
Empires crumble from within . . .
Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket Surfer knows it too! Just hope a marble don't fall out.Now that is a good one. I am not standing in front of him when he lines up a putt.
BUCKET BOYOriginally Posted by elygc1 Those of you that have worked with Mac, would you say that he feels that Homer's work is 30% incomplete or 30% inaccurate. I was looking for some information and couldn't find much.elygc1,
Originally Posted by comrade
p.s. comrade yoda , where did you get those icons with the bandanas and blood on them ? i would like to have an entire army of those little guys !
: rambo : (without the spaces)Originally Posted by mrodockmrodock,
I thought I would answer your request comrade, lest you send your army of rambos after me!
Originally Posted by comrade mrodock,Indeed
it's nice to have the little golfing machine revolutionaries behind you ??!!!
!
Originally Posted by comrade elygc1,Yowza! I like how you connect them dots!
i have not worked with mr. o'grady but i have heard his criticisms the golfing machine.
mr. o'grady says the book is 65% correct. i'm assuming that this implies that the book is 35% incorrect , and i'm assuming that the criticisms below, according to mr. o'grady , are the total 35% that he considers incorrect. it could be that he has other criticisms for the book being in his words, "tragically flawed", if so he might like to enlighten us.
the criticisms of the book according to mr. o'grady are:
1. there is no bibliography.
2. he doesn't like the terminology.
3. hitting doesn't exist.
these criticisms of the propositions of the golfing machine have the interesting feature that IF ; 1) we tack on a bibliography and , 2 ) we simply change words that signify certain concepts , and 3) we make the simple point that it is possible for a human arm to push against the clubshaft , ( i don't think it would take a team of "researchers" to study this in order to to verify the truth of this empirical proposition ,i believe anyone could test this for themselves .) THEN these criticisms of the propositions of the golfing machine are no longer criticisms . the book is now 100% correct .
thus , the criticisms of mr. o'grady are a matter of taste and misunderstanding
your golfing machine comrade in arms
p.s. comrade yoda , where did you get those icons with the bandanas and blood on them ? i would like to have an entire army of those little guys !
Originally Posted by comrade elygc1,
i have not worked with mr. o'grady but i have heard his criticisms the golfing machine.
mr. o'grady says the book is 65% correct. i'm assuming that this implies that the book is 35% incorrect , and i'm assuming that the criticisms below, according to mr. o'grady , are the total 35% that he considers incorrect. it could be that he has other criticisms for the book being in his words, "tragically flawed", if so he might like to enlighten us.
the criticisms of the book according to mr. o'grady are:
1. there is no bibliography.
2. he doesn't like the terminology.
3. hitting doesn't exist.
these criticisms of the propositions of the golfing machine have the interesting feature that IF ; 1) we tack on a bibliography and , 2 ) we simply change words that signify certain concepts , and 3) we make the simple point that it is possible for a human arm to push against the clubshaft , ( i don't think it would take a team of "researchers" to study this in order to to verify the truth of this empirical proposition ,i believe anyone could test this for themselves .) THEN these criticisms of the propositions of the golfing machine are no longer criticisms . the book is now 100% correct .
thus , the criticisms of mr. o'grady are a matter of taste and misunderstanding
your golfing machine comrade in arms
p.s. comrade yoda , where did you get those icons with the bandanas and blood on them ? i would like to have an entire army of those little guys !
Originally Posted by 12 piece bucket Hey Comrade . . . here's some "substantive criticism" of the book . . .
It's absolutely impossible to understand . . . heck even read . . . without a guiding hand.
You find me ONE person who has ever been able to get the book without the help of an AI or Homer Kelley directly.
That book should sold as a PDF file that is capable of being searched. And should come with multimedia to demonstrate the concepts. Mr. Kelley did the best with the technology he had . . . a freakin' typewriter (not even a word processor).
But we have the techology now to basically make the book accessable to the "masses." Will it ever happen???