
A bold question, to be sure.
Any takers?

Originally Posted by airair Ben Hogan's pane of glass?There are so many great images in that book, too! The grip, the turning belt ahead of the arms....
(Can't find the picture from his book)
Originally Posted by airair Ben Hogan's pane of glass?Hogan's 'plane of glass' Plane illustration is arguably the most famous illustration in golf. It is also among the most erroneous. Especially when combined with the three accompanying illustrations showing the 'baseline' shift to the right during the Downstroke.
(Can't find the picture from his book)
Originally Posted by Yoda Hogan's 'plane of glass' Plane illustration is arguably the most famous illustration in golf. It is also among the most erroneous. Especially when combined with the three accompanying illustrations showing the 'baseline' shift to the right during the Downstroke.
My benchmark of "important" demands that the illustration also be correct.
Next?
Originally Posted by wedgy If the benchmark is that the illustration also be correct wouldn't that disqualify your pic. also as it doesn't include a real event of impact as no clubshaft will be in that position in a real swing at impact. They actually deflect the exact opposite way at that moment as the clubhead goes to a lead position from a lag position.Point taken, wedgy, but I stand by the point of the photo: the golfer should keep the ball and the head behind the hands.
Originally Posted by Yoda Point taken, wedgy, but I stand by the point of the photo: the golfer should keep the ball and the head behind the hands.
Also, the stressed shafts could be taken to represent Clubhead Lag Pressure Point Pressure as felt in the #3 Pressure Point (right index finger). That is the way it feels.
Finally, my personal alignments are correct.
![]()
Originally Posted by Bumpy Perhaps it is because I have embraced the 'Darkside' but my benchmark would be based on producing an effect for the intended audience. Regarding the pane of glass, .....Quit swinging across the ball. There are a bunch of, "if you try do this, god willing, you won't do that", directed specifically at the masses(they appear to have missed the idea completely). -example- I would say the aiming point procedure is designed to produce an effect. For the player at least, I would say practicallity takes precedents over reality. The instructor should know both, without it there can be no balance in 'the force'.
Da, dot, da da, dot, da da, dot, da da.......
With good intentions,
Bumpy
.........and yes, I already have a touch of cabin fever here in Michigan.
Originally Posted by innercityteacher "No, I am Spartacus!"I must admit to being oblivious to the practical application of the Golden ratio to my golfswing. In fact, my proportions are more akin to an apple, Golden Delicious seems more appropriate.![]()
I can't get the picture to come up but here is the link to it:
http://creativesagest.blogspot.com/
Here is another link to software that will allow you to overlay "Golden Ratio" sections over anything, say like a golf swing:
http://www.atrise.com/golden-section/
Remember all those black and white photos of a golfer going back and forth at high speed?
HK, as an engineering type, knew of this picture and "proportionalism" or what the Greeks called "analogia." I will assert that he knew and understood the order and balance of human design. I think HK knew the answer ("It all works together by design!" and reverse engineered how effective golf swingsbio-mechanically worked.
ICT
Originally Posted by YodaNew cover for my personal swing keys diary. I love it!!!
A bold question, to be sure.
Any takers?
![]()
Originally Posted by YodaLynn, what significance, if any, do you attach to the shaft bend seen here?
A bold question, to be sure.
Any takers?
![]()
Originally Posted by O.B.Left Coincidence? I doubt it.Good catch OB. I hadn't noticed the significance of the logo before. I've got to get glasses, or YODA needs a bigger logo. That is FANTASTIC!
Did Lynn ever elaborate on this? Did that orange ring kill Bucket? Where the heck is that guy?
Originally Posted by Yoda Byron Nelson, 1937, the year he first won The Masters.
Note:
(1) The Clubhead is a blur;
(2) The camera couldn't catch the Clubshaft; and
(3) The Ball is still on the ground.
Then . . .
Check out the Hands.
![]()
Originally Posted by O.B.Left Coincidence? I doubt it.
Did Lynn ever elaborate on this? Did that orange ring kill Bucket? Where the heck is that guy?
Originally Posted by GPStyles Last seen at ABS.There are a thousand ways to hit a Golf Ball.





Originally Posted by Daryl
Some fine points that I've learned to encourage and maintain Clubhead Lag through the Impact Interval. CL has almost nothing to do with speed. Acceleration only needs to apply a greater force than the strength of the shaft and the weight of Clubhead inertia. And, Stiff shafts bend easily. Stiffer is better. Stiff shafts stay with you.
- Don't create more Lag than you're prepared to Sustain (need for the length of shot)
- The Right Forearm must be Driven through Release and Impact
- The Right Forearm Flying Wedge must remain Intact. The Right Forearm Flying Wedge Alignment is what brings Clubhead Lag into Impact. Without the Alignment, no amount of Thrust will help. Clubhead Lag is "Keyed into" the Right Arm Flying Wedge Alignment at "Startdown".
- The Right Elbow must Straighten as the RFFW approaches the Angle of Approach for Impact. It's easy to lose Clubhead Lag when the Hands Slow. If you can't maintain Hand Acceleration, then use a smaller Pulley. That's what it's there for.
- The #3 Pressure Point is indispensable from start to finish. "Trace and Drag".
If you can learn to sustain Tip Bend on a fishing pole, then you can learn to sustain Clubhead Lag with a Golf Club.